This page is now locked, please put any new guideline TODOs at
This page follows on from the Guideline Review 2007/08
This page should be used to list out all the outstanding identified
guideline changes that still need discussion, formulating etc.
- Add glossary
- Outline new guideline update procedure
- Create draft PDF
- Tie guidelines in with current + possible future error checks
- Review QuickStartGuide, see if it can be made shorter?
2. Artist (inc ANV and joins)
- Join field + colabs - rewording proposal at
http://www.discogs.com/help/forums/topic/189303#2384328 . This
incorporates or attempts to address the following:
- Solve or explain the joined / separated artist name problem -
Why is Simon And Garfunkel joined? When should this rule be
- Should there be an automatic separator used for the join field?
ATM it defaults to no separator, but this is usually (always?)
"a comma between them if there is no joiner on the release
itself.". mjb I believe suggested that the slash (/) seems to be
a good default, but pipes and commas are also a possibility.
nik - let's go with a comma, it's less visually distracting for
me and strikes me as less 'loaded'.
- Make clarifications under "The Join Field and Artist
Collaboration" section that collaborating artists must be
distinct. So, (artist X) Presents (alias of artist X) is not
considered a collaboration; it must always be split. This topic
was raised in discussion at
http://www.discogs.com/help/forums/topic/186422 and the
proposed guideline change is at
- How to title split releases without a given title.
- No explicit forbidding of slash-separated titles for
non-double-A-sided singles without sleeves, should there be?
I think yes! What's the difference if there is no sleeve? In practice
this would mean that a non-double-A-sided release will be submitted with
only title A if there is a sleeve and with 2 titles if there is not.
What's the use of that? Seems confusing to me... (marcelrecords)
- Discuss and figure out something more people can agree upon re:
items with multiple cat#s on them:
- multiple cat#s for a single item intended to be sold under
different #s in different territories (such as on many WEA
releases in UK+Europe), regardless of whether corresponding,
single-cat# items exist for each territory
- extra cat#s added by distributors (via stickers, stamps, custom
printing, or not mentioned on the release at all) - interesting
cases include EFA, Caroline, etc., which call into question
where to draw the line between distributor and licensee label
- cat#s in typographic artwork, including those possibly
accidentally left on an item by a licensee label
- Explain matrix numbers and their use as catalog numbers
- Explain how to differentiate between a new label, and a series on an
- Something needs to be added about cat#/distribution code confusion.
It is hard to differentiate between the two looking at a release in
- http://www.discogs.com/help/forums/topic/131564 add the situation
of jamaican matrix numbers to the next guideline revision (as in:
DSR... are not catalogue numbers but matrix numbers, please add them
to notes blahblah)
- Typo fix: The "by released" needs to be replaced with "for release"
in this sentence: "DIDX - Recordings pressed by DADC by released on
non-Sony-affiliated record labels."
- Explain the correct action for capitalisation differences in catalog
numbers http://www.discogs.com/help/forums/topic/188735 - follow
- Update label guidelines for distributors and the like -
- CD versus CDr - Needs a few
lines (and a picture) to explain that commercial, consumer-audio
CDRs (a.k.a. audio-CDRs) can very well include a barcode and etched
numbers, but no IFPI codes. A serial number, however, is (seemingly
without exception) always printed in a "dot-matrix"-like format on
the inner ring.
- CD versus CDr - Pressed CDs often are visibly different in their
data-containing portions, so remove the following blanket statement
from the guidelines: An additional method to discern if the media
you hold is a pressed CD or CDr is to look for a difference in the
hues. A CDr that is burnt will display a ring where the data has
been written. The ring starts from the inner hub, and will be a
lighter shade than the rest of the CDr. The less that has been
burned, or the shorter length of the stored audio, the smaller the
burnt circle will be. You cannot tell how much data is stored on a
pressed CD by this same method, as the whole underside will be a
Why are styles required for the electronic genre and not for the rest?
Proposal - remove this requirement or even extend it to the other